Supreme Court – Landmark Decision Handed Down regarding Real Rate of Return
Posted in News on Thursday, February 2nd, 2017
In November 2015, the Court of Appeal handed down its Decision in the case of Gill Russell –v- HSE. The Medical Negligence Team at Cantillons had represented Gill Russell in the High Court, where he got a significant award for Personal Injuries he sustained during his birth. In the High Court, Mr. Justice Kevin Cross made pronouncements on the Law in relation to the manner in which damages were to be calculated in the future, in cases such as Gill Russell’s where there is likely to be significant future expenditure. The Court dealt with the legal / economic issue of the Real Rate of Return. The Team at Cantillons argued that the Real Rate of Return should be reduced from 3% to 1%, with a consequence that the award for Gill would be significantly increased. The Court accepted Cantillons argument, and awarded over €15 million to Gill. The HSE Appealed Mr. Justice Cross’s reasoning in relation to the Real Rate of Return. In a landmark Decision, the Court of Appeal rejected the HSE’s Appeal and confirmed the Decision of Mr. Justice Cross. Not satisfied with this result, the Defendants sought leave to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court. After much deliberation, the Supreme Court have today refused leave to appeal, bringing this debate to a final determination in favour of keeping the Real Rate of Return at 1%.
This is a ground breaking case, because it affects all other cases of catastrophic injury.
Contact us at Cantillons Solicitors at +353 (0)21 -4275673 or email@example.com if you would like more information.
*In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement.